just to rre-inforce the need, Bliss keeps pushing japanese version for some reason...
1 Chandelier = シャンデリア
2 Big Girls Cry = ビッグ・ガールズ・クライ
2 Big Girls Cry = ビッグ・ガールズ・クライ
3 Burn The Pages = バーン・ザ・ページズ
4 Eye Of The Needle = アイ・オブ・ザ・ニードル
5 Hostage = ホステージ
6 Straight For The Knife = ストレート・フォー・ザ・ナイフ
7 Fair Game = フェア・ゲーム
I could imagine something like that indeed. I would how ever provide an option to let the user choose the locale, or geoip or origin of the artist if that is an available information.
One thing to look at may be from Plex, that will provide you the option to auto match the meta, or let you fill in the details to do the search manually, provide a list, pick one and tag accordingly the selected tracks.
Had that feeling indeed : the fixes are queued, in the order they were selected. If you try to fix a track name or meta after fixing the path, then the queue won't be able to process as the track is not to be found anymore before a new scan is made and location is re assessed.
One things that could be interesting to remedy somehow would be to filter by action type the inbox so that one can first fix album names before any change is done to rest of the meta. since this would be the key to anything that comes later.
I would prioritize :
2.All meta details
- rescan for compliancy validation.
final comliancy checking
Absolutly : one may be able to rank the quality / codec / bit-rate combo and state that this format is the one you want to keep when duplicates are found.
The duplicate process is not clear enough on the format found.
I would prefere to keep Flac over MP3,
However, when i have 5.1 flac and MP3, i'd like to keep booth.
The automate enging may not be able to curate the whole library, but could allow a group fix when the dups meet the ranking list.
As of today, it is not very clear what is being deleted, and most of all, when 2 mp3 are dups, you don't know which one is 128k and which one is 320.
I would also add these details in the list of tracks (put dups next to each other), make a multiple check mark and get rid of the selection - if the auto selection is not able to choose by it self.
- note maybe worth in a different topic. Some drastic measures like deleting may be only available when track names and album etc... things that allows to make sure the track what it pretends to be are actually finalized. I felt like there is a right order to do things.
not to me.
Technically this could also lead to reduce more duplicates, or consolidate an album from several disseminated tracks.
It could also lead to discover some new music :)
The rabbit hole could also lead to something like "virtual album"... but let's do not go there just yet. :)
I would love to do that. Especially when a i ended up with some stupid Radio compilation like UK list wanted top 20 hits...
Some compilation do make sense to stay together though : Charity concert, Duets...
I mean i'd keep together a compilation when ever something connects the tracks together. Soundtracks. To me, in these case, the album name would prevail over the artists name(s). namecategorzation
I would typically want to do the opposite. SPlitting appart compilations to to put these tracks into their original album, wherever they came from.... instead of some stupid "2000 UK hits" album...